Template talk:Interactions

Wares
I'm not sure if I agree with the purpose of this template to list a merchant's wares.

See Heodan vs. Ponamu Bird-Scorned for a comparison.

I think, I like the table on the former better. More useful, more information contained. What do you think? --  -- You talkin' to me? -- cCContributions -- 09:00, 2 December 2017 (UTC)


 * I agree. The former is better and more informative. I'd also like to do something like that with a Cargo-integrated template eventually, so that we can check across various tables and show where Item X can be acquired, like in locations, loot, shops. −Pangaearocks (talk) 14:39, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 * It's meant to be an overview, not a precise list of wares. I.e. "this character sells weapons" with a more detailed listing below. Tagaziel (talk) 15:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Like you did specifically with the mentioned Heodan – that's perfect for me. :) -- UserCCCSig.png  -- You talkin' to me? -- cCContributions -- 13:23, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Romance (or alike)
Regarding this – should we add a romance/intercourse option to this template? (Due to not having played it, yet, I have absolutely no idea how romance works in .) And what would be the best term to speak of sex? --  -- You talkin' to me? -- cCContributions -- 10:22, 7 January 2019 (UTC)


 * It's not really a thing/mechanic, just consists of a chain of optional dialogue that appears when you reach a certain reputation with a companion, and only a few companions have it. Probably more suited for "other" as opposed to having it's own field - and since it's limited to companions I think even just a note on the page (as per the change linked) does the job. Macklin (talk) 10:29, 7 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Remains the question about the wording: I wouldn't call me prudish, but somehow I have an issue with "you even can have sex with her". If that's only my opinion, however … -- UserCCCSig.png  -- You talkin' to me? -- cCContributions -- 11:18, 7 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Yeah I though that was a bit rough too, especially since it's just implied. How about just "Xoti can be romanced if your reputation with her is positive 2 or higher. More "intimate" dialogue options are available after she wakes up from the nightmare." Macklin (talk) 11:36, 7 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Applied. -- UserCCCSig.png  -- You talkin' to me? -- cCContributions -- 11:41, 7 January 2019 (UTC)